Thursday, October 20, 2011

Sen. Marco Rubio...is...a...liar

The Washington Post takes a look at the story the senator likes to tell and how that story has some...um...problems.
He was the son of exiles, he told audiences, Cuban Americans forced off their beloved island after “a thug,” Fidel Castro, took power.

But a review of documents — including naturalization papers and other official records — reveals that Rubio’s dramatic account of his family saga embellishes the facts. The documents show that Rubio’s parents came to the United States and were admitted for permanent residence more than 2½ years before Castro’s forces overthrew the Cuban government and took power on New Year’s Day 1959.
The story continues:
The real story of his parents’ migration appears to be a more conventional immigrant narrative, a couple who came to the United States seeking a better life. In the year they arrived in Florida, the future Marxist dictator was in Mexico plotting a quixotic return to Cuba.
Rubio’s office on Thursday confirmed that his parents arrived in the United States in 1956 but noted that “while they were prepared to live here permanently, they always held out the hope and the option of returning to Cuba if things improved.” They returned to Cuba several times after Castro came to power to “assess the situation with the hope of eventually moving back,” the office said in a statement.
In 2006, on the eve of his ascendance to speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, Rubio told an audience that “in January of 1959 a thug named Fidel Castro took power in Cuba and countless Cubans were forced to flee and come here, many – most – here to America. When they arrived they were welcomed by the most compassionate people on all the Earth.”
The story adds:
In one 2010 interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity, Rubio seemed uncertain of the date of his parents’ arrival, saying “My parents and grandparents came here from Cuba in ’58, ’59. His public statements reviewed by the Post did not give the true date — 1956.
His office tried to clarify the facts in its statement Thursday. After their 1956 arrival, the couple visited Cuba after Castro’s takeover. In 1961, Oriales Rubio took her two children back to Cuba “with the intention of remaining permanently.” Mario remained in Florida “wrapping up the family’s matters.” But within weeks of arriving there, “it because clear that Cuba was headed full speed towards Communism and they decided to return to the U.S,” the statement said.
Now, the Post's report does not destroy Mr. Rubio's political fortunes. But it does necessitate a more complete explanation of the lies (too strong a term for some of you?) he has told. And the confusion about his family might derail any ambitions he might have had to be a vice-presidential candidate next year. 

2 comments:

Alexv said...

No, the word 'lies' is not too strong a word. He's rewritten history to fit his tea party narrative. His 'clarifications' don't pass the smell test.

Anonymous said...

He's a right wing Cuban American politician vaulted to power by a South Florida right wing Cuban exile community for whom the authenticity of that exile story has always been paramount. He lied to them to get ahead, and they bought it and supported him. Maybe they would have too if his name had been Thompson, but we'll never know. He was happy to move to the national stage using that same lie. When people are dying of thirst, you don't lie to them about having water. That's the issue specific "amplifier" of his lie. Rubio's "Baby Jesus Fleeing Herod" gas bubble is finally burst.